Radiology Search - The Right Place for Searching Radiology Information ... A Radiology search engine developed for Radiologists by Radiologists ...
...the most exciting new development in modernized patient care...(read more)
Search Radiology contents from thousands of peer reviewed Radiology websites and hundreds of Radiology journals!

Include: Semantic search :: Video search :: Quick image search
My Search :: About :: What's new :: Forum :: Online Tutorial :: Feedback :: Contact Us :: Home

Bookmark and Share

Published: . Dec 2014

Ko SM, Song MG, Chee HK, Hwang HK, Feuchtner GM, Min JK

Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging: direct comparison with cardiovascular MRI.
(AJR Am J Roentgenol)

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion dual-energy CT (DECT) and its incremental value when used with coronary CT angiography (CTA) for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. One hundred patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease without chronic myocardial infarction detected with coronary CTA underwent stress perfusion DECT, stress cardiovascular perfusion MRI, and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Stress perfusion DECT and cardiovascular stress perfusion MR images were used for detecting perfusion defects. Coronary CTA and ICA were evaluated in the detection of ≥50% coronary stenosis. The diagnostic performance of coronary CTA for detecting hemo-dynamically significant stenosis was assessed before and after stress perfusion DECT on a per-vessel basis with ICA and cardiovascular stress perfusion MRI as the reference standard. The performance of stress perfusion DECT compared with cardiovascular stress perfusion MRI on a per-vessel basis in the detection of perfusion defects was sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 74%; positive predictive value, 73%; negative predictive value, 90%. Per segment, these values were sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 80%; positive predictive value, 63%; and negative predictive value, 88%. Compared with ICA and cardiovascular stress perfusion MRI per vessel territory the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of coronary CTA were 95%, 61%, 61%, and 95%. The values for stress perfusion DECT were 92%, 72%, 68%, and 94%. The values for coronary CTA and stress perfusion DECT were 88%, 79%, 73%, and 91%. The ROC AUC increased from 0.78 to 0.84 (p=0.02) with the use of coronary CTA and stress perfusion DECT compared with coronary CTA alone. Stress perfusion DECT plays a complementary role in enhancing the accuracy of coronary CTA for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.

-> Read fulltext

Read more articles from the authors:
1. Ko SM
2. Song MG
3. Chee HK
4. Hwang HK
5. Feuchtner GM
6. Min JK

Related articles

Read abstract in PubMed

Do search in PubMed

Copy citation:

Export to Bibtex
Export to EndNote
Export to Reference Manager

Bookmark and Share

Add to Yahoo    Add to    Add to Google    Add to AOL    Add to Furl    Add to Connotea    Add to Citeulike    Add to Stumbleupon    Add to Dissect medicine    Add to 2collab   

Add Radiology Search to your search engines :: Put Radiology Search on your website :: Make Radiology Search your homepage :: Add Radiology Search to your favorites
© 2017 Radiology Search